I recently watched a clinic video of Coach Sonny Dykes
talking about goal line offense.
General notes:
Build the sets and your philosophy around your best players.
You avoid the second guessing after the game.
You start your RED ZONE when they change their defense.
He started in a standard 3x1 set with his best WR on the
backside. This happened to be the TE. He gave the QB three options.
Hopefully the QB was taught Football Math.
SINGLE WR side –
Q: Is he single covered? Safety help? LB help?
A: SNAG/HOLE route
3 WR side
Q: Do we have leverage to run bubble? Or any other screen?
A: BUBBLE
B: STICK
BOX
Q: Are there two safeties? 6 or less in the box?
A: INSIDE ZONE
TAGS
X FADE
Z POST
Interesting fact is the over shift of the defense to the
TRIPS side. There was only one time that they ran a play to the trips side.
They lined up in TREY (trips with a TE) and ran STICK.
The three basic options |
Route Descriptions |
Two Safeties = Run the Ball |
No Leverage and Free Safety has cheated over = SNAG |
Two Safeties and Leverage = BUBBLE |
He would also get into a true doubles formations and run the #1 WR toward the goalpost. The QB was coached to throw the ball right under the field goal post! They would work on this during a post practice session.
Here are some screen shots from the video.
Isolated single WR...LB is tucked inside, run the SNAG route. |
Isolated single WR...LB is bumped outside, run the FADE route. |
Favorable box to run INSIDE ZONE. |
Favorable box to run INSIDE ZONE. They ran STICK because of leverage of coverage. |
Single WR coverage. LB inside. Run SNAG! |
What would you do if the defense had 2 defenders to the single reciever. Ex: OLB and corner.
ReplyDeleteThen cover down all 3 front side recievers.
And brought safety in the box.
Essentially Having a cover 0 type look with and taking away your single wr with two defenders and a defender for all 3 wides on front side?
1. Some option based run (ZONE READ, DASH OPTION, VEER) with screen attached
Delete2. RUB CONCEPT by TRIP SIDE
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete